IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i3p623-633..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clypeal patterning in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus: no evidence of adaptive value in the wild

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan P. Green
  • Ellouise Leadbeater
  • Jonathan M. Carruthers
  • Neil S. Rosser
  • Eric R. Lucas
  • Jeremy Field

Abstract

Status signals function in a number of species to communicate competitive ability to conspecific rivals during competition for resources. In the paper wasp Polistes dominulus, variable black clypeal patterns are thought to be important in mediating competition among females. Results of previous behavioral experiments in the lab indicate that P. dominulus clypeal patterns provide information about an individual’s competitive ability to rivals during agonistic interactions. To date, however, there has been no detailed examination of the adaptive value of clypeal patterns in the wild. To address this, we looked for correlations between clypeal patterning and various fitness measures, including reproductive success, hierarchical rank, and survival, in a large, free-living population of P. dominulus in southern Spain. Reproductive success over the nesting season was not correlated with clypeal patterning. Furthermore, there was no relationship between a female’s clypeal patterning and the rank she achieved within the hierarchy or her survival during nest founding. Overall, we found no evidence that P. dominulus clypeal patterns are related to competitive ability or other aspects of quality in our population. This result is consistent with geographical variation in the adaptive value of clypeal patterns between P. dominulus populations; however, data on the relationship between patterning and fitness from other populations are required to test this hypothesis.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan P. Green & Ellouise Leadbeater & Jonathan M. Carruthers & Neil S. Rosser & Eric R. Lucas & Jeremy Field, 2013. "Clypeal patterning in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus: no evidence of adaptive value in the wild," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 623-633.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:3:p:623-633.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars226
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lynn Siefferman & Geoffrey E. Hill, 2003. "Structural and melanin coloration indicate parental effort and reproductive success in male eastern bluebirds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(6), pages 855-861, November.
    2. Lorenzo Zanette & Jeremy Field, 2009. "Cues, concessions, and inheritance: dominance hierarchies in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(4), pages 773-780.
    3. Elizabeth A. Tibbetts & Tracy R. Curtis, 2007. "Rearing conditions influence quality signals but not individual identity signals in Polistes wasps," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(3), pages 602-607.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lindsay J. Henderson & Britt J. Heidinger & Neil P. Evans & Kathryn E. Arnold, 2013. "Ultraviolet crown coloration in female blue tits predicts reproductive success and baseline corticosterone," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(6), pages 1299-1305.
    2. Katharina Hoffmann & Kevin R. Foster & Judith Korb, 2012. "Nest value mediates reproductive decision making within termite societies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(6), pages 1203-1208.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:3:p:623-633.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.