IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i2p349-354..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evidence of signaling benefits to contrasting internal color boundaries in warning coloration

Author

Listed:
  • Marianne Aronsson
  • Gabriella Gamberale-Stille

Abstract

It has been suggested that the common existence of regular patterning in aposematic prey animals makes them "stand out" from the background, improving detection and recognition. Another suggestion is that internal patterns could have a similar positive effect on predator aversion learning as prey-to-background contrast. We used wild caught blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) and artificial prey signals to investigate if internal color boundaries, pattern regularity and pattern symmetry affect learning. Birds in different treatments were trained, on a complex background, to discriminate between artificial prey with different nonrewarding color stimuli with a black pattern and rewarding stimuli without a black pattern, followed by a generalization test. This study provides evidence of learning benefits to internally contrasting patterns as the striped prey stimuli were learned faster than the unstriped. Also, we found no beneficial effects of pattern regularity and symmetry. The birds generalized more between prey with different black patterns than to the profitable prey, suggesting that color is of foremost importance. The generalization test also showed a greater avoidance of striped than that of unstriped prey, suggesting some attention on patterns. Thus, internal patterning may affect signal salience and in some circumstances benefit prey due to both a faster avoidance learning and generalization behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Marianne Aronsson & Gabriella Gamberale-Stille, 2013. "Evidence of signaling benefits to contrasting internal color boundaries in warning coloration," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 349-354.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:2:p:349-354.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars170
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katrine Hauglund & Snorre B. Hagen & Helene M. Lampe, 2006. "Responses of domestic chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus) to multimodal aposematic signals," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(3), pages 392-398, May.
    2. Anders Forsman & Joakim Herrström, 2004. "Asymmetry in size, shape, and color impairs the protective value of conspicuous color patterns," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(1), pages 141-147, January.
    3. Marianne Aronsson & Gabriella Gamberale-Stille, 2009. "Importance of internal pattern contrast and contrast against the background in aposematic signals," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(6), pages 1356-1362.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marina Dimitrova & Sami Merilaita, 2012. "Prey pattern regularity and background complexity affect detectability of background-matching prey," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 384-390.
    2. Ossi Nokelainen & Sanni A. Silvasti & Sharon Y. Strauss & Niklas Wahlberg & Johanna Mappes, 2024. "Predator selection on phenotypic variability of cryptic and aposematic moths," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:2:p:349-354.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.