IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i1p53-62..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Amphibians’ response to the lunar synodic cycle—a review of current knowledge, recommendations, and implications for conservation

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel Grant
  • Tim Halliday
  • Elizabeth Chadwick

Abstract

The way in which amphibians respond to the geophysical changes brought about by the lunar synodic cycle is a neglected area of their ecology, but one which has recently generated interest. Knowledge of how amphibians respond to lunar phase is of intrinsic interest and also may be important for conservation and monitoring of populations. We surveyed the literature on amphibians’ responses to the lunar cycle and found 79 examples where moon phase in relation to amphibian behavior and ecology had been studied, across diverse amphibian taxa. Of the examples reviewed, most of them show some type of response to lunar phase, with only a few species being unaffected. We found that there is no significant difference between the numbers of species which increase, and those that decrease activity or reproductive behavior (including calling) during a full moon. The responses to the lunar cycle can not be generalized across taxonomic group, but instead are highly species specific and relate directly to the species’ ecology. The primary reasons for changes in amphibian behavior in response to the lunar cycle appear to be temporal synchronization of breeding and predator avoidance. Responses to changes in prey availability, facilitation of visual signalling and use of lunar cues in navigation and homing are less prevalent but merit further investigation. Comparisons between studies are hampered by differences in field and analytical methods; we therefore make a number of recommendations for future collection and analysis of data related to lunar phase.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel Grant & Tim Halliday & Elizabeth Chadwick, 2013. "Amphibians’ response to the lunar synodic cycle—a review of current knowledge, recommendations, and implications for conservation," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 53-62.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:1:p:53-62.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars135
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karin L. Akre & Michael J. Ryan, 2011. "Female túngara frogs elicit more complex mating signals from males," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(4), pages 846-853.
    2. John L. Orrock & Brent J. Danielson & R. Jory Brinkerhoff, 2004. "Rodent foraging is affected by indirect, but not by direct, cues of predation risk," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(3), pages 433-437, May.
    3. Phillip G. Byrne & J. Dale Roberts, 2004. "Intrasexual selection and group spawning in quacking frogs (Crinia georgiana)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(5), pages 872-882, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew D Cronin & Judith A H Smit & Wouter Halfwerk, 2022. "Anthropogenic noise and light alter temporal but not spatial breeding behavior in a wild frog [Lack of consistent responses to aircraft noise in dawn song timing of bird populations near tropical a," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(6), pages 1115-1122.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anu Eskelinen & Maria-Theresa Jessen & Hector A. Bahamonde & Jonathan D. Bakker & Elizabeth T. Borer & Maria C. Caldeira & W. Stanley Harpole & Meiyu Jia & Luciola S. Lannes & Carla Nogueira & Harry O, 2023. "Herbivory and nutrients shape grassland soil seed banks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Sheri L. Johnson & H. Jane Brockmann, 2013. "Parental effects on early development: testing for indirect benefits of polyandry," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1218-1228.
    3. Carolin Dittrich & Ariel Rodríguez & Ori Segev & Sanja Drakulić & Heike Feldhaar & Miguel Vences & Mark-Oliver Rödel & Michael TaborskyHandling editor, 2018. "Temporal migration patterns and mating tactics influence size-assortative mating in Rana temporaria," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(2), pages 418-428.
    4. Savannah L Bartel & John C Kilgo, 2023. "White-tailed deer responses to acoustic predator cues are contingent upon past land use and contemporary fire regime," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(6), pages 1013-1022.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:1:p:53-62.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.