IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i1p39-46..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maternally chosen nest sites positively affect multiple components of offspring fitness in a lizard

Author

Listed:
  • Aaron M. Reedy
  • David Zaragoza
  • Daniel A. Warner

Abstract

Maternal nest-site choice is a behavioral phenotype with transgenerational consequences that can appear at multiple stages of offspring ontogeny. In many reptiles, the microenvironment surrounding eggs (e.g., moisture) can affect multiple aspects of offspring fitness across several life stages (e.g., embryo survival, phenotypic development, and posthatching survival). Thus, natural selection should favor maternal nesting behaviors that positively affect both embryonic and postembryonic ontogenetic trajectories. We tested this hypothesis in a 2-part laboratory experiment using the brown anole lizard (Anolis sagrei). In the first experiment, gravid lizards were given a choice of nesting substrates containing 5 levels of moisture content. By incubating eggs at the same 5 moisture levels, our second experiment tested if maternal choice of nest substrate facilitates embryonic development and enhances offspring quality and viability. Females strongly preferred nesting substrates with high moisture content, and these conditions yielded high hatching success, large offspring size, and overall increased offspring survival. These results suggest that selection has adaptively matched maternal nesting behaviors, embryonic development, and posthatching phenotypes in ways that enhance both offspring and parental fitness. In addition, our results highlight the importance of incorporating multiple life-history stages when assessing the fitness consequences of transgenerational effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Aaron M. Reedy & David Zaragoza & Daniel A. Warner, 2013. "Maternally chosen nest sites positively affect multiple components of offspring fitness in a lizard," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 39-46.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:1:p:39-46.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars133
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:1:p:39-46.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.