IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i1p198-204..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of recruitment to direct predator cues on predator responses in meerkats

Author

Listed:
  • Markus Zöttl
  • Raphaela Lienert
  • Tim Clutton-Brock
  • Eva Millesi
  • Marta B. Manser

Abstract

Behavioral responses of animals to direct predator cues (DPCs; e.g., urine) are common and may improve their survival. We investigated wild meerkat (Suricata suricatta) responses to DPCs by taking an experimental approach. When meerkats encounter a DPC they often recruit group members by emitting a call type, which causes the group members to interrupt foraging and approach the caller. The aim of this study was to identify the qualities of olfactory predator cues, which affect the strength of response by meerkats, and determine the benefits of responses to such cues. Experimental exposure to dog (Canis lupus) urine as a DPC revealed that the recruited individuals increased vigilance to fresh urine in comparison to older urine, whereas a higher quantity of urine did not induce such an effect. Both freshness and higher quantities increased the proportion of group members recruited. These results indicate that recruitment might play a crucial role in correctly assessing the current level of danger and that recruiting might facilitate group decision making. To test the prediction that the reaction to a DPC enhances early predator response, we presented a DPC of a predator and a control cue of a herbivore, and each time simultaneously moved a full-mounted caracal (Caracal caracal) in the vicinity of the group. Meerkats responded earlier to the caracal when the DPC was presented, indicating that the response to a DPC facilitates predator response and that they use information from the cue that reliably reflects the risk in the current moment.

Suggested Citation

  • Markus Zöttl & Raphaela Lienert & Tim Clutton-Brock & Eva Millesi & Marta B. Manser, 2013. "The effects of recruitment to direct predator cues on predator responses in meerkats," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 198-204.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:1:p:198-204.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars154
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claire L. Devereux & Mark J. Whittingham & Esteban Fernández-Juricic & Juliet A. Vickery & John R. Krebs, 2006. "Predator detection and avoidance by starlings under differing scenarios of predation risk," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(2), pages 303-309, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:1:p:198-204.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.