IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i1p128-135..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Finding food: outbound searching behavior in the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Schultheiss
  • Ken Cheng

Abstract

Foragers of Melophorus bagoti often return to previously rewarding sites to search for more food items. They are opportunistic scavengers that exploit both protein and carbohydrate food sources. Under natural foraging conditions, protein food items are distributed sparsely and randomly, whereas carbohydrates come in patches that are often renewable. This makes for vastly different foraging scenarios that a single forager is confronted with. In theory, foraging performance can be greatly improved if foragers are able to adjust their strategy to different food item distributions. This could be achieved through individual foraging experience or by employing pre-existing, intrinsic foraging strategies. We investigated this by offering both kinds of food with the same distribution: as a renewable food source at a fixed location. After removal of the food source, outbound foragers displayed an area-restricted search centered on its location. Searches for protein had a greater spread than those for carbohydrates, which matches the natural distribution pattern of these food types. However, searches for both kinds of food follow the same general strategy, which is best described as a Brownian-like walk. We suggest that the observed adaptive behavior is a result of differential learning effort.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Schultheiss & Ken Cheng, 2013. "Finding food: outbound searching behavior in the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 128-135.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:1:p:128-135.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars143
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:1:p:128-135.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.