IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i1p119-127..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does hatching failure breed infidelity?

Author

Listed:
  • Malika Ihle
  • Bart Kempenaers
  • Wolfgang Forstmeier

Abstract

In socially monogamous species, the reasons for female infidelity are still controversial. It has been suggested that females could seek extra-pair copulations as an insurance against hatching failure caused by male infertility or incompatibility. In species where couples breed repeatedly, females could use previous hatching success as a cue to assess their partner’s infertility (or incompatibility). Hence, it has been predicted that females should increase their infidelity after experiencing hatching failures, but to our knowledge this hypothesis has never been tested experimentally. We manipulated hatching success of pairs in a captive population of zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata), a species that forms lifelong pair bonds, and measured female willingness to engage in extra-pair copulation. By experimentally cross-fostering fertile and infertile eggs, couples either experienced 100% or about 35% hatching success in each of three consecutive clutches. Contrary to our prediction, females that experienced repeated hatching failure did not increase their responsiveness toward extra-pair males relative to those females with 100% hatching success. Moreover, there was no difference in female calling rate for the partner after male removal and no occurrence of divorce when the opportunity was given. These findings seem to contradict the common view that reproductive failure weakens the pair bond. Furthermore, a critical review of the literature suggests that there is no convincing evidence supporting this hypothesis in other species either. We therefore highlight that this fundamental area of behavioral ecology research is still much in need of specific experimental work that controls for confounding factors. Key words: divorce, extra-pair mating, fertility insurance, hatching failure, pair bond, zebra finch

Suggested Citation

  • Malika Ihle & Bart Kempenaers & Wolfgang Forstmeier, 2013. "Does hatching failure breed infidelity?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 119-127.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:1:p:119-127.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars142
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emma C. Pariser & Mylene M. Mariette & Simon C. Griffith, 2010. "Artificial ornaments manipulate intrinsic male quality in wild-caught zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(2), pages 264-269.
    2. Leigh W. Simmons & Robin M. Tinghitella & Marlene Zuk, 2010. "Quantitative genetic variation in courtship song and its covariation with immune function and sperm quality in the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(6), pages 1330-1336.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aurelie Seguin & Wolfgang Forstmeier, 2012. "No Band Color Effects on Male Courtship Rate or Body Mass in the Zebra Finch: Four Experiments and a Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-11, June.
    2. Leigh W. Simmons, 2012. "Resource allocation trade-off between sperm quality and immunity in the field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 168-173.
    3. Nicola-Anne J Rutkowski & Yong Zhi Foo & Therésa M Jones & Kathryn B McNamara, 2023. "Age, but not an immune challenge, triggers terminal investment in the Pacific field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(3), pages 468-479.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:1:p:119-127.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.