IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i1p113-118..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collective choice of a higher-protein food source by gregarious caterpillars occurs through differences in exploration

Author

Listed:
  • Melanie McClure
  • Lisanne Morcos
  • Emma Despland

Abstract

Amplification, whereby an individual’s probability of exhibiting a particular behavior increases with the number of conspecifics already performing this behavior, enhances the accuracy and speed of collective decision-making by gregarious animals. However, too strong amplification can lead to the potentially suboptimal selection of the first patch encountered. In eusocial insects (e.g., ants, bees), active recruitment and differential signaling provide a mechanism to avoid this type of collective trap. We use the nomadic gregarious caterpillar Malacosoma disstria to test whether the higher quality of two food sources can be consistently selected in the absence of this type of mechanism. We show that, in this species, neither active recruitment nor differential signaling occur, but that collective choice of the higher quality of two food sources is instead made through differences in exploration. These caterpillars lack flexibility in trail laying, but a reduction in trail following behavior enables them to abandon a poor food source and initiate exploration, forming new trails that are followed by the group. The propensity to leave marked territory and initiate exploration varies with food quality, and increases with decreasing protein content in the food. Indeed, although previous work showed that caterpillar groups can become trapped on a poor-quality protein-only food, we show that they abandon a similarly poor-quality low-protein food and relocate to a more nutritionally appropriate one. This is consistent with previous work showing that protein deprivation increases exploratory behavior in individual caterpillars and suggests that food quality can influence collective foraging in ways more complex than a simple distinction between high and low quality sources. Furthermore, the latency to initiate exploration also decreases with increasing group size, as the probability that a single individual initiates exploration increases. Contrary to previously studied species, amplification is not modulated according to source quality in this species; instead it is through effects on exploration that food protein content and caterpillar group size influence collective decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Melanie McClure & Lisanne Morcos & Emma Despland, 2013. "Collective choice of a higher-protein food source by gregarious caterpillars occurs through differences in exploration," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 113-118.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:1:p:113-118.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars141
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stéphane Portha & Jean-Louis Deneubourg & Claire Detrain, 2002. "Self-organized asymmetries in ant foraging: a functional response to food type and colony needs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(6), pages 776-781, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodrigues, João, 2007. "How ants determine the number of potential recruits," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 384-392.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:1:p:113-118.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.