Author
Listed:
- Juan C. Alonso
- Marina Magaña
- Jose M. Álvarez-Martínez
Abstract
The distinction between true lekking and resource-defense mating systems is difficult in exploded-lekking species, where resources in male territories may influence female choice. Here, we propose the use of path analysis as a way to establish the relative importance of phenotypic characteristics versus food resources on mating success and hence decide whether a population is closer to one or the other extreme of an exploded lek-resource-defense continuum. Using great bustards Otis tarda as model species, we first performed logistic regression analyses of potential predictors of display sites in three leks. Males selected sites with high visibility, close to resources, and exposed to females. Second, we examined through path analysis how the mating success of radiotagged males was affected by resources, females and competitors, compared with age and weight, the major phenotypic correlates of mating success. The direct effects of age and weight were much higher than their indirect effects via resources or females. This suggests that female choice based on male characters is the most important sexual selection mechanism during mating and supports defining the great bustard mating system as a true exploded lek. However, half of the males showed a variable degree of resource defense toward intruders, indicating that both mating tactics, exploded lekking and resource defense, occur together in the same population. We suggest that individual variability in the use of resource defense might exist in many other exploded-lekking species, increasing the difficulties found in fitting their mating behavior to accepted definitions of alternative mating tactics. [Behav Ecol]
Suggested Citation
Juan C. Alonso & Marina Magaña & Jose M. Álvarez-Martínez, 2012.
"Male display areas in exploded leks: the importance of food resources for male mating success,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(6), pages 1296-1307.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:6:p:1296-1307.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:6:p:1296-1307.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.