IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i6p1250-1256..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fungus-gardening ants prefer native fungal species: do ants control their crops?

Author

Listed:
  • Jon N Seal
  • Jeffrey Gus
  • Ulrich G. Mueller

Abstract

Fundamental features of mutualisms are solutions to conflict. The mutualism between fungus-gardening ants and their fungi is characterized by pronounced evolutionary ant-fungus fidelity. Ant-fungus fidelity is thought to be controlled by the fungus, which secretes somatic incompatibility compounds that suppress incompatible fungal strains that may invade gardens. Accordingly, the ants are thought to perceive incompatibilities and then reject invading cultivars. During cultivar-switch experiments, we discovered that if switched colonies of the ant Trachymyrmex septentrionalis are successful in retaining a minute fragment of their original garden, the ants will gradually co-cultivate the novel and the original fungus strains in a chimeric (polycultural) garden; this chimeric garden will revert after 1–2 weeks completely to a monoculture of the original fungal strain. Experimental examination of worker preference suggests that symbiont rejection behavior seems to be an innate response toward foreign fungi rather than mediated solely by incompatibility compounds secreted by the fungus. These observations suggest that the fungal strain cultivated by a colony imprints the attending ants, and this imprinting modifies ant behavior so that the ants prefer their original cultivar even when experimentally forced to grow a foreign cultivar for several weeks. Fungal monocultures and ant-fungus fidelities in this symbiosis therefore seem to be reinforced by factors intrinsic to both the ants and the fungi.

Suggested Citation

  • Jon N Seal & Jeffrey Gus & Ulrich G. Mueller, 2012. "Fungus-gardening ants prefer native fungal species: do ants control their crops?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(6), pages 1250-1256.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:6:p:1250-1256.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars109
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fudenberg, Drew & Archetti, Marco & Green, Jerry R. & Pierce, Naomi Ellen & Yu, Douglas W. & Úbeda, Francisco, 2011. "Let the Right One In: A Microeconomic Approach to Partner Choice in Mutualisms," Scholarly Articles 9962009, Harvard University Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:6:p:1250-1256.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.