IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i6p1186-1194..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pack social dynamics and inbreeding avoidance in the cooperatively breeding red wolf

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda M. Sparkman
  • Jennifer R. Adams
  • Todd D. Steury
  • Lisette P. Waits
  • Dennis L. Murray

Abstract

For cooperatively breeding groups composed of close relatives, whether and how a group avoids inbreeding are questions of key evolutionary and conservation importance. A number of strategies for inbreeding avoidance may be employed by cooperative breeders, including extrapair reproduction, reproductive suppression, and juvenile dispersal. However, population-wide information on the prevalence of different strategies is difficult to obtain. We investigated the prevalence of inbreeding and potential mechanisms for inbreeding avoidance in a reintroduced population of the red wolf. Using long-term data on individuals of known pedigree, we determined that inbreeding among first-degree relatives was rare. Potential mechanisms for inbreeding avoidance included low levels of philopatric reproduction in spite of delayed dispersal, and reproductive suppression prior to dispersal. Inbreeding avoidance among siblings may have been further facilitated by independent dispersal trajectories, as many young wolves spent time alone or in small nonbreeding packs composed of unrelated individuals. The dominant pattern of breeding-pair formation involved the union of 2 unrelated individuals in a new home range. Replacement of 1 or both members of an existing breeding pair involved new immigrants to a pack or, in a small number of cases, ascendance of either resident offspring or adopted pack members to vacant breeding positions. Extrapair reproduction was rare, suggesting that it was not a major mechanism for outbreeding. We conclude that there are several prevalent behavioral strategies within the red wolf population that may work together to minimize inbreeding and any associated fitness costs, helping make cooperative breeding an evolutionarily viable strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda M. Sparkman & Jennifer R. Adams & Todd D. Steury & Lisette P. Waits & Dennis L. Murray, 2012. "Pack social dynamics and inbreeding avoidance in the cooperatively breeding red wolf," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(6), pages 1186-1194.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:6:p:1186-1194.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars099
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amanda M. Sparkman & Jennifer R. Adams & Todd D. Steury & Lisette P. Waits & Dennis L. Murray, 2011. "Direct fitness benefits of delayed dispersal in the cooperatively breeding red wolf (Canis rufus)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(1), pages 199-205.
    2. Deborah A. Randall & John P. Pollinger & Robert K. Wayne & Lucy A. Tallents & Paul J. Johnson & David W. Macdonald, 2007. "Inbreeding is reduced by female-biased dispersal and mating behavior in Ethiopian wolves," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(3), pages 579-589.
    3. Ashleigh S. Griffin & Josephine M. Pemberton & Peter N. M. Brotherton & Grant McIlrath & David Gaynor & Ruth Kansky & Justin O'Riain & Timothy H. Clutton-Brock, 2003. "A genetic analysis of breeding success in the cooperative meerkat (Suricata suricatta)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(4), pages 472-480, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Dyble & Tim H Clutton-Brock, 2023. "Turnover in male dominance offsets the positive effect of polygyny on within-group relatedness," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(2), pages 261-268.
    2. H. J. Nichols & M. B. V. Bell & S. J. Hodge & M. A. Cant, 2012. "Resource limitation moderates the adaptive suppression of subordinate breeding in a cooperatively breeding mongoose," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 635-642.
    3. Allison S. Cox & Dylan C. Kesler, 2012. "Prospecting behavior and the influenceof forest cover on natal dispersal in aresident bird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(5), pages 1068-1077.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:6:p:1186-1194.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.