IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i5p999-1008..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternative reproductive tactics in female horseshoe crabs

Author

Listed:
  • Sheri L. Johnson
  • H. Jane Brockmann

Abstract

Consistent differences among females in mating with one (monandrous) or multiple males (polyandrous) may be a product of male behavior or may reveal the existence of female alternative reproductive tactics (ARTs). The distinction is an important one for understanding the evolution of sexually selected behavior. We evaluated whether ARTs exist in female horseshoe crabs (Limulus polyphemus), a species in which male alternative reproductive tactics are well known. In this species, attached pairs migrate to shore and spawn on high tides; the male fertilizes the female's eggs externally with free-swimming sperm as the eggs are being laid. Unattached males are attracted to pairs by visual and chemical cues and become satellites of some females while ignoring others. We used multiple lines of evidence, including mark/resighting; measurements of size, physical condition, and eggs laid; and field manipulations of female response to satellite males. We show that even at high nesting densities with intense male–male competition, some females mated only with their one attached male, and females were consistently monandrous or polyandrous across multiple nestings. Monandrous females did not attract satellites but when males were experimentally manipulated to join monandrous pairs, some females stopped nesting and left rather than nest with a satellite male. These females tended to be smaller than polyandrous females. Our results suggest condition-dependent differences between monandrous and polyandrous females that result in different context-dependent mating decisions by monandrous and polyandrous females to cope with sexual conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheri L. Johnson & H. Jane Brockmann, 2012. "Alternative reproductive tactics in female horseshoe crabs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(5), pages 999-1008.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:5:p:999-1008.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars063
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barney Luttbeg, 2004. "Female mate assessment and choice behavior affect the frequency of alternative male mating tactics," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(2), pages 239-247, March.
    2. H. Jane Brockmann, 2002. "An experimental approach to altering mating tactics in male horseshoe crabs (Limulus polyphemus)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(2), pages 232-238, March.
    3. Peter D. Dijkstra & Sander van Dijk & Ton G.G. Groothuis & Michele E.R. Pierotti & Ole Seehausen, 2009. "Behavioral dominance between female color morphs of a Lake Victoria cichlid fish," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(3), pages 593-600.
    4. Colin Bleay & Barry Sinervo, 2007. "Discrete genetic variation in mate choice and a condition-dependent preference function in the side-blotched lizard: implications for the formation and maintenance of coadapted gene complexes," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(2), pages 304-310.
    5. Michael Tobler & Ingo Schlupp & Martin Plath, 2011. "Costly interactions between the sexes: combined effects of male sexual harassment and female choice?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(4), pages 723-729.
    6. Patrice Rosengrave & Neil J. Gemmell & Victoria Metcalf & Katherine McBride & Robert Montgomerie, 2008. "A mechanism for cryptic female choice in chinook salmon," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(6), pages 1179-1185.
    7. Phillip G. Byrne & Martin J. Whiting, 2011. "Effects of simultaneous polyandry on offspring fitness in an African tree frog," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(2), pages 385-391.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sheri L. Johnson & H. Jane Brockmann, 2013. "Parental effects on early development: testing for indirect benefits of polyandry," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1218-1228.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth Bastiaans & Gen Morinaga & José Gamaliel Castañeda Gaytán & Jonathon C. Marshall & Barry Sinervo, 2013. "Male aggression varies with throat color in 2 distinct populations of the mesquite lizard," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 968-981.
    2. Elizabeth A Hobson & Simon DeDeo, 2015. "Social Feedback and the Emergence of Rank in Animal Society," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Karatetskaya Efrosiniya & Lakshina Valeriya, 2018. "Volatility Spillovers With Spatial Effects On The Oil And Gas Market," HSE Working papers WP BRP 72/FE/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    4. Sheri L. Johnson & H. Jane Brockmann, 2013. "Parental effects on early development: testing for indirect benefits of polyandry," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1218-1228.
    5. Guillem Pérez i de Lanuza & Enrique Font & Pau Carazo, 2013. "Color-assortative mating in a color-polymorphic lacertid lizard," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 273-279.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:5:p:999-1008.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.