IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i5p940-943..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The challenges of mixing associational learning theory with information-based decision-making theory

Author

Listed:
  • Meredith Root-Bernstein

Abstract

Behavioral ecologists frequently incorporate associational learning (AL) concepts into studies of choice behavior. Within behavioral ecology, AL is often considered a mechanism for information gathering. AL also provides alternative explanations of behavioral phenomena up to the level of motivational organization over the lifetime. AL assumes that all inputs to the learning system interact through a multistep process with feedbacks to control behavior and that cues are characterized by contingencies, whereas behavioral ecology assumes that learning inputs independently control responses, are in conflict, and convey information. Integrating the 2 perspectives is not straightforward and can lead to conflicting predictions or loss of predictive power. I examine 2 sets of case studies. First, I look at parallel research programs on mating in quail. Second, I consider how AL concepts have been integrated into foraging studies of nectarivores. The papers on quail mating demonstrate that to a large degree, the 2 approaches explain similar behaviors in compatible ways. The nectarivore papers show how the theories diverge, with AL predicting challenging results. Future studies should examine how much individuals select between sources of information and how much they respond to combinations of and interactions between cues within the process described by AL, using experimental designs that allow explicit cross-paradigm comparisons through the use of identical measurements of response.

Suggested Citation

  • Meredith Root-Bernstein, 2012. "The challenges of mixing associational learning theory with information-based decision-making theory," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(5), pages 940-943.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:5:p:940-943.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars057
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ida Bacon & T. Andrew Hurly & Susan D. Healy, 2011. "Hummingbirds choose not to rely on good taste: information use during foraging," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(3), pages 471-477.
    2. Emma C. Siddall & Nicola M. Marples, 2008. "Better to be bimodal: the interaction of color and odor on learning and memory," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(2), pages 425-432.
    3. Nina E. Fatouros & Marcel Dicke & Roland Mumm & Torsten Meiners & Monika Hilker, 2008. "Foraging behavior of egg parasitoids exploiting chemical information," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(3), pages 677-689.
    4. Barnaby Marsh & Cynthia Schuck-Paim & Alex Kacelnik, 2004. "Energetic state during learning affects foraging choices in starlings," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(3), pages 396-399, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Vasconcelos & Tiago Monteiro & Alex Kacelnik, 2013. "Context-Dependent Preferences in Starlings: Linking Ecology, Foraging and Choice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-7, May.
    2. Cynthia Schuck-Paim & Lorena Pompilio & Alex Kacelnik, 2004. "State-Dependent Decisions Cause Apparent Violations of Rationality in Animal Choice," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(12), pages 1-1, November.
    3. Ben Webster & Erika Qvarfordt & Ulf Olsson & Robert Glinwood, 2013. "Different roles for innate and learnt behavioral responses to odors in insect host location," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 366-372.
    4. Armando Alfaro-Tapia & Jeniffer K. Alvarez-Baca & Eduardo Fuentes-Contreras & Christian C. Figueroa, 2021. "Biological Control May Fail on Pests Applied with High Doses of Insecticides: Effects of Sub-Lethal Concentrations of a Pyrethroid on the Host-Searching Behavior of the Aphid Parasitoid Aphidius colem," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Michael E Vickers & Lisa A Taylor, 2018. "Odor alters color preference in a foraging jumping spider," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(4), pages 833-839.
    6. Hannah M. Rowland & Graeme D. Ruxton & John Skelhorn, 2013. "Bitter taste enhances predatory biases against aggregations of prey with warning coloration," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 942-948.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:5:p:940-943.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.