IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i5p1126-1132..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dominance status and sex influence nutritional state and immunity in burying beetles Nicrophorus orbicollis

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra Steiger
  • Susan N. Gershman
  • Adam M. Pettinger
  • Anne-Katrin Eggert
  • Scott K. Sakaluk

Abstract

Intrasexual competition for mates or resources important for reproduction often leads to the establishment of dominance relationships that influence an individual’s reproductive success. Although dominance can be an honest indicator of health or immunocompetence, the attainment and maintenance of dominance status can also influence an individual’s ability to invest in immunity, making it difficult to disentangle cause and effect. Here we examine the relationship between intrasexual competition and the nutritional condition and immunity of burying beetles, Nicrophorus orbicollis, insects that reproduce on small vertebrate carcasses that serve as a larval food source. We staged intrasexual contests on carcasses in both sexes and compared the nutritional state and immunity of dominant and subordinate individuals with those of beetles reproducing on a carcass without competitors. The nutritional state and immunity of dominant beetles were not significantly different from beetles without competitors, but subordinates were characterized by a lower weight gain and reduced encapsulation response. In addition, we found a clear sex effect, with females gaining more weight than males and having superior immunity. We conclude that the subordinate’s exclusion from the carcass plays an important role in mediating the difference in encapsulation. Our data suggest that this is not entirely a nutritional effect because better-fed subordinates did not exhibit higher immune responses. Rather, subordinates may have no need to invest in improved immunity because they do not participate in carcass maintenance and defense.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra Steiger & Susan N. Gershman & Adam M. Pettinger & Anne-Katrin Eggert & Scott K. Sakaluk, 2012. "Dominance status and sex influence nutritional state and immunity in burying beetles Nicrophorus orbicollis," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(5), pages 1126-1132.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:5:p:1126-1132.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars082
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus J. Rantala & Raine Kortet, 2004. "Male dominance and immunocompetence in a field cricket," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(2), pages 187-191, March.
    2. Adam M. Pettinger & Sandra Steiger & Josef K. Müller & Scott K. Sakaluk & Anne-Katrin Eggert, 2011. "Dominance status and carcass availability affect the outcome of sperm competition in burying beetles," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(5), pages 1079-1087.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petri T. Niemelä & Niels J. Dingemanse & Nico Alioravainen & Anssi Vainikka & Raine Kortet, 2013. "Personality pace-of-life hypothesis: testing genetic associations among personality and life history," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(4), pages 935-941.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:5:p:1126-1132.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.