IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i3p676-683..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bolder, older, and selective: factors of individual-specific foraging behaviors in Steller’s jays

Author

Listed:
  • Christina Rockwell
  • Pia O. Gabriel
  • Jeffrey M. Black

Abstract

Several species of animals, particularly corvids, will sample from a collection of items before making a decision. There is an expected trade-off between investing effort in making better choices and increased exposure to risk. Little is known about individuals’ consistency in sampling behavior and whether it covaries with other behavior traits. Risk-taking and neophobia are documented components of behavioral syndromes; we examined whether sampling behavior is comparable. We quantified food sampling behavior (i.e., number of items sampled, visit duration, and number of items taken) of individual Steller’s jays (Cyanocitta stelleri) during experimental field trials. Sampling behavior of individual jays was moderately repeatable within and between winter field seasons and was positively correlated with birds’ willingness to approach a novel object and take food in front of a predator mount. These results suggest that food sampling is a measurable component in the suite of traits comprising the Steller’s jay behavioral syndrome. Model selection techniques indicated that sampling behavior was more common in older, neophilic, risk-prone, larger jays, whereas jays that took multiple items were more likely to be older and risk-prone. This suggests that experience and size may additionally influence individuals’ habitual foraging behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina Rockwell & Pia O. Gabriel & Jeffrey M. Black, 2012. "Bolder, older, and selective: factors of individual-specific foraging behaviors in Steller’s jays," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 676-683.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:3:p:676-683.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars015
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niels Jeroen Dingemanse & Piet de Goede, 2004. "The relation between dominance and exploratory behavior is context-dependent in wild great tits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(6), pages 1023-1030, November.
    2. Michelle Farwell & Robert L. McLaughlin, 2009. "Alternative foraging tactics and risk taking in brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(5), pages 913-921.
    3. Pekka Kontiainen & Hannu Pietiäinen & Kalle Huttunen & Patrik Karell & Heikki Kolunen & Jon E. Brommer, 2009. "Aggressive Ural owl mothers recruit more offspring," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(4), pages 789-796.
    4. Jeroen Minderman & Jane M. Reid & Peter G.H. Evans & Mark J. Whittingham, 2009. "Personality traits in wild starlings: exploration behavior and environmental sensitivity," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(4), pages 830-837.
    5. Kees van Oers & Margreet Klunder & Piet J. Drent, 2005. "Context dependence of personalities: risk-taking behavior in a social and a nonsocial situation," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(4), pages 716-723, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabrielle Dubuc-Messier & Denis Réale & Philippe Perret & Anne Charmantier, 2017. "Environmental heterogeneity and population differences in blue tits personality traits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(2), pages 448-459.
    2. repec:cup:judgdm:v:2:y:2007:i::p:326-332 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Avichai Snir & Dudi Levy & Dian Wang & Haipeng Allan Chen & Daniel Levy, 2024. "Large Effects of Small Cues: Priming Selfish Economic Decisions," Papers 2405.03893, arXiv.org.
    4. Ralf H. J. M. Kurvers & Bart A. Nolet & Herbert H. T. Prins & Ronald C. Ydenberg & Kees van Oers, 2012. "Boldness affects foraging decisions in barnacle geese: an experimental approach," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(6), pages 1155-1161.
    5. Christina Lehmkuhl Noer & Esther Kjær Needham & Ann-Sophie Wiese & Thorsten Johannes Skovbjerg Balsby & Torben Dabelsteen, 2015. "Context Matters: Multiple Novelty Tests Reveal Different Aspects of Shyness-Boldness in Farmed American Mink (Neovison vison)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    6. Chloé Monestier & Nicolas Morellet & Jean-Michel Gaillard & Bruno Cargnelutti & Cécile Vanpé & A.J. Mark Hewison, 2015. "Is a proactive mum a good mum? A mother’s coping style influences early fawn survival in roe deer," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1395-1403.
    7. Chen, Junlin & Zhao, Yingshuai, 2020. "High price or low price? An experimental study on a markdown pricing policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 240-254.
    8. Catherine Brandner, 2007. "Strategy selection during exploratory behavior: sex differences," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 2, pages 326-332, October.
    9. Jon E. Brommer & Patrik Karell & Kari Ahola & Teuvo Karstinen, 2014. "Residual correlations, and not individual properties, determine a nest defense boldness syndrome," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(4), pages 802-812.
    10. Mei-Ling Bai & Lucia Liu Severinghaus & Mark Todd Philippart, 2012. "Mechanisms underlying small-scale partial migration of a subtropical owl," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 153-159.
    11. Ping Huang & Kathryn E. Sieving & Colette M. St. Mary, 2012. "Heterospecific information about predation risk influences exploratory behavior," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 463-472.
    12. Samantha C Patrick & Lucy E Browning, 2011. "Exploration Behaviour Is Not Associated with Chick Provisioning in Great Tits," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-7, October.
    13. Hannah A. Edwards & Terry Burke & Hannah L. Dugdale, 2017. "Repeatable and heritable behavioural variation in a wild cooperative breeder," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(3), pages 668-676.
    14. Nolwenn Fresneau & Edward Kluen & Jon E. Brommer, 2014. "A sex-specific behavioral syndrome in a wild passerine," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(2), pages 359-367.
    15. Wei, Jia & Chen, Hong & Long, Ruyin, 2016. "Is ecological personality always consistent with low-carbon behavioral intention of urban residents?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 343-352.
    16. Lisa J Wallis & Ivaylo B Iotchev & Enikő Kubinyi, 2020. "Assertive, trainable and older dogs are perceived as more dominant in multi-dog households," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, January.
    17. Anders Pape Møller & Jan Tøttrup Nielsen, 2014. "Parental defense of offspring and life history of a long-lived raptor," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1505-1512.
    18. Alison Bell, 2013. "Randomized or fixed order for studies of behavioral syndromes?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 16-20.
    19. László Zsolt Garamszegi & Gábor Markó & Gábor Herczeg, 2013. "A meta-analysis of correlated behaviors with implications for behavioral syndromes: relationships between particular behavioral traits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1068-1080.
    20. David F. Westneat & Matthew Schofield & Jonathan Wright, 2013. "Editor's choice Parental behavior exhibits among-individual variance, plasticity, and heterogeneous residual variance," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 598-604.
    21. Katherine A. Herborn & Britt J. Heidinger & Lucille Alexander & Kathryn E. Arnold, 2014. "Personality predicts behavioral flexibility in a fluctuating, natural environment," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1374-1379.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:3:p:676-683.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.