IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i3p615-618..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unmasking Zorro: functional importance of the facial mask in the Masked Shrike (Lanius nubicus)

Author

Listed:
  • Reuven Yosef
  • Piotr Zduniak
  • Piotr Tryjanowski

Abstract

The facial mask is a prominent feature in the animal kingdom. We hypothesized that the facial mask of shrikes allows them to hunt into the sun, which accords them detection and surprise-attack capabilities. We conducted a field experiment to determine whether the mask facilitated foraging while facing into the sun. Male shrikes with white-painted masks hunted facing away from the sun more than birds with black-painted masks, which are the natural color, and more than individuals in the control group who were not painted. Furthermore, individuals with white-painted masks hunted at a greater angle in relation to the sun during the experiment than after the paint had eroded from the masks. Mean hunting success was significantly reduced in birds with white-painted masks compared with individuals with black-painted and natural masks. Moreover, individuals with white masks hunted with lower success during the experiment than in the following week when they reverted to their natural mask. We conclude that the facial mask of the Masked Shrike helps overcome the glare of the sun, perhaps allows better identification of prey from their larger shadow, and allows the shrike to approach the prey without alerting it to the stealth attack.

Suggested Citation

  • Reuven Yosef & Piotr Zduniak & Piotr Tryjanowski, 2012. "Unmasking Zorro: functional importance of the facial mask in the Masked Shrike (Lanius nubicus)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 615-618.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:3:p:615-618.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars005
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:3:p:615-618.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.