IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i3p559-565..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Possible top-down control of solitary bee populations by ambush predators

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel A. Rodríguez-Gironés

Abstract

The effect of ambush predators on bee populations has so far been neglected on the assumption that predators ambushing at flowers for the arrival of pollinators are too scarce to have significant effects on population numbers. A simple mathematical model can be used to calculate the maximum predator abundance compatible with positive growth of solitary bee populations. Using published data to estimate model parameters, the model shows that medium-sized (20–80 mg dry weight) solitary bees are very sensitive to predation and their populations can hardly grow when 1–2% of flowers are occupied by ambush predators—a predator abundance well within the range reported in most studies. Smaller and larger bees, on the other hand, can easily cope with normal predator abundances: small bees do not need to visit many flowers to provision an offspring, making it unlikely that they encounter a predator, and large bees are less vulnerable to predator attacks. According to a sensibility analysis, the parameters with the greatest impact on bee population viability are the number of flowers that bees must exploit to provision an offspring and the probability that a bee, upon landing on a predator-harboring flower, is actually captured. It follows that ambush predators cannot be excluded a priori from the list of factors affecting bee diversity and abundance: small changes in the abundance of ambush predators, possibly related to changes in the availability of alternative prey, could have dramatic effects on the viability of medium-sized solitary bees.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel A. Rodríguez-Gironés, 2012. "Possible top-down control of solitary bee populations by ambush predators," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 559-565.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:3:p:559-565.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr228
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tom Reader & Andrew D. Higginson & Christopher J. Barnard & Francis S. Gilbert, 2006. "The effects of predation risk from crab spiders on bee foraging behavior," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(6), pages 933-939, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gustavo Q Romero & Pablo A P Antiqueira & Julia Koricheva, 2011. "A Meta-Analysis of Predation Risk Effects on Pollinator Behaviour," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-9, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:3:p:559-565.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.