IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i2p361-367..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variable mode of estrus affects female decision for multiple mating

Author

Listed:
  • Ines Klemme
  • Saana Kataja-aho
  • Jana A. Eccard
  • Hannu Ylönen

Abstract

Investigating patterns of variation in mating strategies may shed light on their evolutionary importance as well as their impact on the strength and shape of sexual selection. Multimale mating (polyandry) and mate choice are intensely studied subjects in the area of sexual selection, but little is known about intraspecific patterns of variation that may respond to dynamic cost-benefit balances. In a laboratory study, we investigated the mating behavior of female bank voles (Myodes glareolus) with distinctly different time and energy budgets: They were either in cycling estrus (CE) or postpartum estrus (PPE) shortly after delivery. Postpartum mating is highly constrained by time and energy due to maternal commitments to the newborn litter. All females had a free and simultaneous choice among 4 males that differed in scent-marking frequency (indicator of dominance) and body mass. We show that females in CE engaged significantly more often in multimale mating than females in PPE. Additionally, PPE females mated with males that scent marked more, whereas CE females seemingly mated indiscriminately. We discuss our findings in light of time and energy budgets of females and also consider alternative explanations such as pup protection against infanticidal males or physiological constraints to estrus modes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ines Klemme & Saana Kataja-aho & Jana A. Eccard & Hannu Ylönen, 2012. "Variable mode of estrus affects female decision for multiple mating," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 361-367.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:2:p:361-367.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr193
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:2:p:361-367.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.