IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v22y2011i5p1064-1069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information gleaned and former patch quality determine foraging behavior of parasitic wasps

Author

Listed:
  • P. Louâpre
  • J. van Baaren
  • J.S. Pierre
  • J.J.M. van Alphen

Abstract

A good estimate of patch quality is of prime importance for a randomly searching forager with limited longevity or fecundity. The forager can perceive cues related to the presence of resource on arrival in a patch and estimates its quality relatively to previous patches. This prior estimate can then be updated through sampling in the patch. However, these 3 sources of information have never been manipulated independently in the same experiment to quantify the effect of each one on foraging behavior. Here, we report experiments highlighting the mechanism by which the braconid Asobara tabida, a parasitoid wasp laying eggs in Drosophila larvae, uses information both gleaned from the previous patch visited and obtained on arrival in the next one, to estimate the quality of the latter and to behave accordingly. We disentangled the effects of the prior estimate of patch quality made on arrival in the patch and the effect of sampling in the patch on the foraging behavior of the parasitoid. We show that information gleaned by A. tabida from a previously visited patch plays a strong role in the response to both chemical cues and oviposition events by parasitoid when exploiting a patch. The information process highlighted in the present study is consistent with the Bayesian-like decision-making, which is suspected in parasitoids, bumblebees, and humans. Moreover, motivation to stay in the patch is likely to be tuned to the forager's experience. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • P. Louâpre & J. van Baaren & J.S. Pierre & J.J.M. van Alphen, 2011. "Information gleaned and former patch quality determine foraging behavior of parasitic wasps," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(5), pages 1064-1069.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:5:p:1064-1069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr090
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:5:p:1064-1069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.