IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v22y2011i4p710-716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genetic diversity, colony chemical phenotype, and nest mate recognition in the ant Formica fusca

Author

Listed:
  • Heikki Helanterä
  • Yasmin R. Lee
  • Falko P. Drijfhout
  • Stephen J. Martin

Abstract

Recognition of relatives is often crucial for adaptive social behavior, but availability of recognition cues may limit adaptation. Social insect workers direct altruism toward relatives through nest mate recognition. We studied whether genetic diversity increases nest mate recognition cue diversity and weakens nest mate recognition behavior in the ant Formica fusca that has both multiple and single queen societies in sympatric populations. Despite larger genetic diversity in multiple queen than single queen colonies, we found no differences in chemical recognition cue diversity or aggression toward non-nest mates in behavioral bioassays. The results suggest that the relationship between individual genotypes and the colony chemical phenotype is a complex interaction of genes and the environment, including the social setting of the colony and that increase in genetic diversity does not increase cue diversity to levels that would cause informational constraints on recognition behavior in the species. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Heikki Helanterä & Yasmin R. Lee & Falko P. Drijfhout & Stephen J. Martin, 2011. "Genetic diversity, colony chemical phenotype, and nest mate recognition in the ant Formica fusca," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(4), pages 710-716.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:4:p:710-716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr037
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:4:p:710-716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.