IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v22y2011i3p594-600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responses to intruder scents in the cooperatively breeding meerkat: sex and social status differences and temporal variation

Author

Listed:
  • Rafael Mares
  • Andrew J. Young
  • Danielle L. Levesque
  • Nicola Harrison
  • Tim H. Clutton-Brock

Abstract

Although sex-specific responses to intruder scent marks have been described in many mammal species, less is known about variation in responses in cooperatively breeding species where differential access to breeding opportunities exists within groups. When reproductive skew is high, strong responses to extragroup breeding rivals would be expected mainly from dominant individuals, with levels of investment depending on female receptiveness. However, evidence from controlled experiments on cooperative breeders for sex and social status differences in responses to intruder scent marks is limited. Here, we investigated responses to intruder scent marks in cooperatively breeding meerkats (Suricata suricatta), where a single dominant pair largely monopolizes within-group reproduction. A series of experimental presentations using feces were used to test first, whether meerkats discriminate between resident and extragroup male scent marks; second, whether sex and social status affect the response to intruding male scents; and third, whether dominant males increase their level of response when dominant females are most receptive. Our results suggest that meerkats are able to discriminate between resident and intruding male scent marks and show that dominant males have the strongest overall response to intruder scent marks, which does not increase with female receptiveness. We suggest that, although all group members may be affected by the presence of intruders, reproductive conflict may be the main reason for the stronger response of dominant males to extragroup male scent marks in this cooperatively breeding species with high reproductive skew. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafael Mares & Andrew J. Young & Danielle L. Levesque & Nicola Harrison & Tim H. Clutton-Brock, 2011. "Responses to intruder scents in the cooperatively breeding meerkat: sex and social status differences and temporal variation," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(3), pages 594-600.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:3:p:594-600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr021
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simon W. Townsend & Maria Rasmussen & Tim Clutton-Brock & Marta B. Manser, 2012. "Flexible alarm calling in meerkats: the role of the social environment and predation urgency," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(6), pages 1360-1364.
    2. Charlotte Christensen & Andrew N Radford, 2018. "Dear enemies or nasty neighbors? Causes and consequences of variation in the responses of group-living species to territorial intrusions," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(5), pages 1004-1013.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:3:p:594-600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.