IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v22y2011i3p559-565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monogamous dominant pairs monopolize reproduction in the cooperatively breeding pied babbler

Author

Listed:
  • Martha J. Nelson-Flower
  • Phil A.R. Hockey
  • Colleen O'Ryan
  • Nichola J. Raihani
  • Morné A. du Plessis
  • Amanda R. Ridley

Abstract

Understanding how reproduction is partitioned between group members is essential in explaining the apparent reproductive altruism of cooperatively breeding systems. Here, we use genetic data from a population of cooperatively breeding pied babblers (Turdoides bicolor) to show that reproduction is highly skewed toward behaviorally dominant birds. Dominant birds monopolized reproduction, accounting for 95.2% of all chicks. Inbreeding avoidance appears to constrain subordinate reproduction because the rare incidences of subordinate reproduction occurred only with unrelated members of their groups. However, even when unrelated potential breeding partners were present in the group, subordinates rarely bred. Although half of chicks hatched into groups where subordinates could potentially breed, only 9.6% of these chicks had a subordinate parent, indicating that additional factors limit subordinate reproduction, such as reproductive conflict with dominants. Groups were highly kin structured and most subordinates were closely related to one another such that help was almost invariably directed toward close relatives. Consequently, helping in this species confers indirect fitness benefits on subordinates, which are likely to play an important role in the evolution and maintenance of cooperative helping behavior. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Martha J. Nelson-Flower & Phil A.R. Hockey & Colleen O'Ryan & Nichola J. Raihani & Morné A. du Plessis & Amanda R. Ridley, 2011. "Monogamous dominant pairs monopolize reproduction in the cooperatively breeding pied babbler," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(3), pages 559-565.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:3:p:559-565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr018
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amanda R Bourne & Amanda R Ridley & Susan J Cunningham, 2023. "Helpers don’t help when it’s hot in a cooperatively breeding bird, the Southern Pied Babbler," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(4), pages 562-570.
    2. H. J. Nichols & M. B. V. Bell & S. J. Hodge & M. A. Cant, 2012. "Resource limitation moderates the adaptive suppression of subordinate breeding in a cooperatively breeding mongoose," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 635-642.
    3. Sabrina Engesser & Amanda R Ridley & Marta B Manser & Andri Manser & Simon W Townsend, 2018. "Internal acoustic structuring in pied babbler recruitment cries specifies the form of recruitment," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(5), pages 1021-1030.
    4. Amanda R Bourne & Amanda R Ridley & Claire N Spottiswoode & Susan J Cunningham, 2021. "Direct and indirect effects of high temperatures on fledging in a cooperatively breeding bird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1212-1223.
    5. Oded Keynan & Amanda R. Ridley & Arnon Lotem, 2015. "Social foraging strategies and acquisition of novel foraging skills in cooperatively breeding Arabian babblers," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(1), pages 207-214.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:3:p:559-565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.