Author
Listed:
- Daniel Ruf
- Dominique Mazzi
- Silvia Dorn
Abstract
Discrimination against kin as mates, via genetic or environmentally derived cues of relatedness, can prevent inbreeding and thus enhance individual fitness and promote population survival. Sex in the parasitoid wasp Cotesia glomerata L. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) is determined by one locus with multiple alleles, a mechanism termed single-locus complementary sex determination (sl-CSD). Under sl-CSD, haploid individuals are males, whereas diploid individuals are females when heterozygous at the sex determination locus but males when homozygous. In species with sl-CSD, inbreeding leads to increased incidence of matings between individuals sharing an allele at the sex locus and thus to increased diploid male production. Diploid males cause an undesirable sex ratio distortion and can be of inferior fitness. To evade these deleterious effects, species with sl-CSD are expected to avoid inbreeding. We investigated whether C. glomerata females discriminate against close kin as mating partners. We performed a mate choice experiment, which allowed us to distinguish between kin discrimination based on the perception of phenotype-related cues and kin discrimination based on the perception of cues associated with the developmental environment. As kin discrimination is often mediated through cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs), we additionally examined composition of the CHC profiles of males. We found no evidence for discrimination against related or familiar males nor for differences in the CHC profiles of males. These results indicate that kin discrimination is not a relevant inbreeding avoidance strategy in C. glomerata. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Daniel Ruf & Dominique Mazzi & Silvia Dorn, 2010.
"No kin discrimination in female mate choice of a parasitoid with complementary sex determination,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(6), pages 1301-1307.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:6:p:1301-1307
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:6:p:1301-1307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.