IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2010i6p1227-1235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disturbance across an ecosystem boundary drives cannibalism propensity in a riparian consumer

Author

Listed:
  • Michelle J. Greenwood
  • Angus R. McIntosh
  • Jon S. Harding

Abstract

Biotic and abiotic interactions between adjacent ecosystems are common and can take the form of resource subsidies or spillover effects of disturbance. These cross-ecosystem exchanges may have significant impacts on the recipient ecosystem by altering the occurrence of strong biotic interactions, such as cannibalism. Cannibalism is ubiquitous and has the potential to be a defining feature in many food webs through impacts on population and community structure. However, there is little empirical evidence detailing how environmental gradients in adjacent ecosystems may alter cannibalism propensity of predators that live on the ecosystem boundary. We investigated cannibalism propensity of a riparian spider across a flooding gradient that altered both the magnitude of an allochthonous prey subsidy to the spider (winged aquatic insects) and spider habitat availability (loose riverbank rocks). Spider density was affected by the interaction of prey and habitat availability across the environmental gradient with small-scale spider densities highest at both stable and disturbed rivers and intermediate at others. Stable isotope analysis of spiders and a mesocosm experiment indicated that cannibalism was higher at stable and disturbed rivers. This demonstrates that an environmental gradient in one system can indirectly alter the propensity for strong biotic interactions of a consumer in an adjacent system through interactive effects of allochthonous and in situ resources. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Michelle J. Greenwood & Angus R. McIntosh & Jon S. Harding, 2010. "Disturbance across an ecosystem boundary drives cannibalism propensity in a riparian consumer," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(6), pages 1227-1235.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:6:p:1227-1235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arq140
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:6:p:1227-1235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.