IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2010i5p986-991.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prey naiveté in an introduced prey species: the wild rabbit in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Isabel C. Barrio
  • C. Guillermo Bueno
  • Peter B. Banks
  • Francisco S. Tortosa

Abstract

Early detection of predators by their prey is an essential element of antipredator tactics, and for many mammalian predator prey interactions, detection comes mainly via a predators olfactory cues. The avoidance of predator odors can reduce the likelihood of encountering predators and increases the chances of prey survival. However, the role of coevolutionary history in the exploitation of odors in mammalian predator--prey interactions is not so well understood. The prey naiveté hypothesis predicts the lack of effective antipredator behaviors given the lack of a coevolution between predator and prey but has so far been only tested on native prey. In this study, we describe the short-time responsiveness of an introduced prey species, the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus), to scents from coevolved and novel predators in Australia. We quantified rabbit activity rates by means of pellet counting and activity indices based on footprints, in a series of experimental plots treated with predator odors, and both methods yielded consistent results. Rabbits responded to coevolved predators by reducing their activity rates to scented experimental plots, whereas no avoidance was found for novel allopatric predators. These results suggest a shared evolutionary history between the antipredatory responses of rabbits and their natural predators. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabel C. Barrio & C. Guillermo Bueno & Peter B. Banks & Francisco S. Tortosa, 2010. "Prey naiveté in an introduced prey species: the wild rabbit in Australia," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(5), pages 986-991.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:5:p:986-991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arq103
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:5:p:986-991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.