IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2010i5p957-965.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying the coalitionary-traits metric: sociality without cooperation in male yellow-bellied marmots

Author

Listed:
  • Lucretia E. Olson
  • Daniel T. Blumstein

Abstract

Mammalian sociality varies both within and between species. We developed a trait-based method to quantify sociality in a continuous way to study the adaptive utility and evolution of male social behavior. The metric is based on 3 key traits--mutual tolerance, collaboration, and partner preference; males with no traits are not social, whereas those with all 3 traits are described as forming coalitions. We applied this framework to systematically describe sociality in the yellow-bellied marmot (Marmota flaviventris). Male marmot sociality varies: social groups contain one to several adult males, who may or may not monopolize reproduction. Through a series of experiments and demographic analyses, we found that male marmots do not appear to discriminate among individuals and thus do not show evidence of partner preference, males do not adjust alarm-calling behavior in a way consistent with male--male collaboration (but may alarm call to preferentially warn kin), and males do not increase their reproductive success by forming multiple-male groups. We conclude that yellow-bellied marmots show rudimentary sociality, with multiple-male groups maintained mainly by an environmental constraint and possible kin selection. The coalitionary-traits metric allowed us to systematically and objectively evaluate the degree of sociality in a socially plastic species. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucretia E. Olson & Daniel T. Blumstein, 2010. "Applying the coalitionary-traits metric: sociality without cooperation in male yellow-bellied marmots," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(5), pages 957-965.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:5:p:957-965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arq094
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:5:p:957-965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.