Author
Abstract
Many animals have successfully adapted to human proximity, with dramatic increases in abundance as a consequence. Although such transitions imply a fitness advantage, the fitness benefits of associations between animals and humans have not been thoroughly investigated. In a comparative study of nest predation, I compared predation rates in 6874 nests of 11 species of birds with sympatric populations breeding indoors and outdoors. Mean nest predation rates were 23.5% outdoors, but only 1.0% indoors, because corvid nest predators never entered buildings. There was a negative correlation between nest predation rate and the proportion of individuals breeding indoors, implying that as species became more adapted to humans, and hence breeding indoors became more frequent, there was a significant decrease in nesting failure that translated into a difference in reproductive success due to reductions in nest predation. Finally, the difference in predation rate between outdoor and indoor nests was related to time since urbanization and number of generations since urbanization, implying that initially there was a large selection differential followed by reduced fitness differences between birds breeding outdoors and indoors due to gradual adaptation to human proximity by reproducing birds. With a high intensity of natural selection, these findings suggest that such adaptation to human proximity may only take a few hundred generations, as shown by several species that have only recently become associated with humans. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Anders Pape Møller, 2010.
"The fitness benefit of association with humans: elevated success of birds breeding indoors,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(5), pages 913-918.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:5:p:913-918
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:5:p:913-918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.