IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2010i5p1054-1060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobbing as a trade-off between safety and reproduction in a songbird

Author

Listed:
  • Arnis Bērziņš
  • Tatjana Krama
  • Indrikis Krams
  • Todd M. Freeberg
  • Inese Kivleniece
  • Cecilia Kullberg
  • Markus J. Rantala

Abstract

Individuals' behavioral responses to predator stimuli may be constrained due to the needs of courtship and reproductive behavior. We tested whether alarm and mobbing behavior in response to predator stimuli was dependent on changes in reproductive behavior in chaffinches (Fringilla coelebs). Male chaffinches may suffer cuckoldry if they become separated from their mates during the fertile period, as would happen in cases of mobbing a predator. After the fertile period has ended, however, as their eggs and subsequent young become increasingly valuable, male chaffinches should devote more effort toward mobbing. We found that the time spent near the female and copulation rates was higher during the preincubation fertile period compared with the incubation period. However, the intensity of mobbing responses to a stuffed avian predator was higher during the incubation period. Furthermore, an experiment that manipulated calling behavior related to mobbing intensity showed that rates of extrapair copulations were higher in treatments of higher intensity mobbing. Taken together, these results indicate that during the breeding season, male chaffinches only engage in antipredator mobbing behavior after the fertile period has ended for their female mate. These data point to an important trade-off between current reproductive effort and antipredator responses. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Arnis Bērziņš & Tatjana Krama & Indrikis Krams & Todd M. Freeberg & Inese Kivleniece & Cecilia Kullberg & Markus J. Rantala, 2010. "Mobbing as a trade-off between safety and reproduction in a songbird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(5), pages 1054-1060.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:5:p:1054-1060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arq104
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:5:p:1054-1060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.