Author
Listed:
- Volker Witte
- Daniel Schliessmann
- Rosli Hashim
Abstract
Adaptive decision making is an important trait of many animals, especially in the context of foraging. Social animals are able to optimize their foraging behavior individually or on a collective level. In the predatory ant Leptogenys diminuta, scout ants search individually for prey and then decide within seconds whether to attack directly or to recruit a large raiding group for a collective attack. Both strategies have inherent costs and benefits, and the information collected by the scout during prey assessment is crucial for an appropriate reaction. We studied how differences in prey type and size are taken into account by experienced and inexperienced scout ants. Although decisions are made under time pressure and frequently without disturbing the prey, experienced scouts adjusted their raiding strategies in accordance with predicted hypotheses. In contrast, inexperienced scouts preferred a risk-averse strategy by recruiting large raiding groups. After a 4-week learning phase, inexperienced scouts developed raiding strategies equal to experienced scouts, independent of hunting success treatments, suggesting a predetermined behavioral repertoire. Using gas chromatography and mass spectrometry, we studied furthermore whether prey items could be discriminated by chemical cues. Natural prey was distinguishable on a high taxonomic level. In raids on chemically treated dummies, however, responses were not equal to those elicited by real prey. Thus, the ants probably integrate additional information, such as visual or tactile cues, into their decision-making process. Overall, L. diminuta exhibits a remarkably cautious, quick, and adaptive decision-making system in which prey cuticular chemicals are incorporated as informational cues. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Volker Witte & Daniel Schliessmann & Rosli Hashim, 2010.
"Attack or call for help? Rapid individual decisions in a group-hunting ant,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(5), pages 1040-1047.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:5:p:1040-1047
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:5:p:1040-1047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.