Author
Listed:
- Misato Okamoto
- Kyohsuke Ohkawara
Abstract
Sex ratio theories based on relatedness asymmetries among colony members have been tested in eusocial Hymenoptera. The haplodiploid sex determination system leads to differences in optimal sex allocation between queens and workers. Queens should ideally produce sexual eggs in accordance with relatedness asymmetries. One of the methods to test this hypothesis is to examine sex allocation in species where relatedness asymmetries are extremely different between female and males produced by the queens. We investigated sex allocation patterns in the polygynous ant Vollenhovia emeryi where both sexes are produced clonally so that the relatedness of the queens to their female and male offspring is 1.0 and 0, respectively. In this situation, queens invest most of their resources in female production. Furthermore, caste allocation patterns were observed in egg production. This study involved genotype analysis of colony members using genetic polymorphic markers and revealed clonal reproduction in the V. emeryi population. In this population, castes were identified in 1,060 eggs produced by 70 queens in 8 colonies. Queens invested more resources in female sexual eggs, though male eggs were also produced depending on resource availability. In addition, the proportion of female eggs negatively correlated with that of worker eggs, suggesting that this correlation is a trade-off. However, male egg production did not affect the egg production of other castes. This observation indicates that male egg production is independent of that for other castes. This study is the first to document the real primary sex ratio and caste allocation in eusocial Hymenoptera. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Misato Okamoto & Kyohsuke Ohkawara, 2010.
"Egg production and caste allocation in the clonally reproductive ant Vollenhovia emeryi,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(5), pages 1005-1010.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:5:p:1005-1010
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:5:p:1005-1010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.