IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2010i4p836-842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compensation for homing errors by using courtship structures as visual landmarks

Author

Listed:
  • Tae Won Kim
  • Tae Keun Kim
  • Jae C. Choe

Abstract

Despite many reports of animals using visual landmarks for homing, surprisingly little is known about construction of landmarks for the purpose of orientation. Semiterrestrial crabs normally use a path integration method for short-range homing, but active courtship or territorial behavior may introduce errors increasing predation risk. We explored the hypothesis that male fiddler crab Uca lactea may build structures for landmark orientation to compensate for errors during courtship. Males without burrows found an artificial burrow with a semidome from a greater distance than one without a semidome. In addition, courting males retreated to the translocated semidome rather than to the original burrow location more frequently than noncourting males did. Finally, the maximum traveling distance from the burrow and the maximum deviation of the longitudinal body axis from the home vector were greater in males with semidomes than males without semidomes. Our results strongly support the hypothesis that male fiddler crabs build structures for landmark homing. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Tae Won Kim & Tae Keun Kim & Jae C. Choe, 2010. "Compensation for homing errors by using courtship structures as visual landmarks," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(4), pages 836-842.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:4:p:836-842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arq067
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:4:p:836-842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.