IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2010i4p730-738.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Virginity and the clutch size behavior of a parasitoid wasp where mothers mate their sons

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Abe
  • Tabitha M. Innocent
  • Sarah E. Reece
  • Stuart A. West

Abstract

Theoretical and empirical research on the evolution of clutch size has proved to be an extremely productive area of evolutionary biology. A general prediction is that individuals should produce a smaller number of offspring when resources are more limited, such as when multiple individuals compete for the same resources for their development. However, we expect that the opposite prediction arises with virgin females of haplodiploid species, which are subject to extreme local mate competition. We test the key assumption and predictions of this theory with the parasitoid wasp Melittobia australica. Our data demonstrate that there is a trade-off between the size of the first and subsequent clutches and that virgin females adjust their production of sons according to the mating status (mated or not) of cofounding females. We also found that mated females facultatively change their offspring sex ratio in response to the mating status of cofoundresses. We discuss the potential mechanisms used to recognize the mating status and the implications of our results in the context of the extremely female-biased sex ratios observed across Melittobia species. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Abe & Tabitha M. Innocent & Sarah E. Reece & Stuart A. West, 2010. "Virginity and the clutch size behavior of a parasitoid wasp where mothers mate their sons," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(4), pages 730-738.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:4:p:730-738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arq046
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:4:p:730-738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.