Author
Listed:
- Margaret J. Couvillon
- William O.H. Hughes
- Juan A. Perez-Sato
- Stephen J. Martin
- Gabrielle G.F. Roy
- Francis L.W. Ratnieks
Abstract
Sexual selection is a dominant force in the evolution of many animals and can be particularly significant in species that mate in aerial swarms characterized by strong male--male competition. However, such mating biology, typical of many social insects, is also quite challenging to study. Here, we investigate sexual selection in the honey bee that has 2 distinct male morphs (normal sized and small). Males mate only once and females return to their nest after mating, making it possible to measure the lifetime fitness of both sexes. We allowed known numbers of normal-sized males from 6 colonies and small males from another 6 colonies to compete for natural matings with experimental virgin queens. We then determined the mating success of males by genotyping the offspring of these queens. Colonies differed by an order of magnitude in the intrinsic mating success of their males, confirming that the reproductive fitness of honey bee colonies is highly variable. Small males achieved approximately half as many matings as expected given their number of flights and, in addition, had a significantly smaller share of paternity per mating than normal-sized males. Interestingly, the flight activity of small males suggested that they may compensate for their lower competitiveness by flying outside the most competitive mating period in the afternoon. The lower fitness of small males shows that sexual selection is strong in honey bees and contributes to inclusive fitness dynamics that favor worker cooperation within their societies. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Margaret J. Couvillon & William O.H. Hughes & Juan A. Perez-Sato & Stephen J. Martin & Gabrielle G.F. Roy & Francis L.W. Ratnieks, 2010.
"Sexual selection in honey bees: colony variation and the importance of size in male mating success,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(3), pages 520-525.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:3:p:520-525
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:3:p:520-525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.