IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2010i2p270-274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trophic dimorphism in alternative male reproductive morphs of the acarid mite Sancassania berlesei

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Łukasik

Abstract

Presence of alternative male morphologies within a species has traditionally been related to different reproductive behaviors of morphs, and sexually selected weapons, that is, structures often present in a major male morph of a species, have been associated exclusively with competition between males over females. In this study, I show that alternative male phenotypes of the acarid mite Sancassania berlesei, one of the model male dimorphic species, differ in their foraging behaviors and diets. When food is deficient, aggressive "fighter" males use their weapons--thickened and sharply clawed third pair of legs, to kill conspecific juveniles and females, as well as individuals from at least one other species, which are subsequently consumed. Unarmed and benign "scrambler" males have no means of feeding in this way. The ecological importance and evolutionary consequences of this trophic dimorphism are unknown, but it might play an important role in fitness trade-offs between alternative male morphologies and, therefore, in evolution of conditional strategies. It might also increase the species' potential for rapid diversification and speciation. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Łukasik, 2010. "Trophic dimorphism in alternative male reproductive morphs of the acarid mite Sancassania berlesei," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(2), pages 270-274.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:2:p:270-274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp186
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:2:p:270-274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.