Author
Listed:
- Yvonne Teuschl
- Constanze Reim
- Wolf U. Blanckenhorn
Abstract
Mating is generally assumed to be costly, but mating costs differ between the sexes. Although mating itself is considered cheaper for males, mate search and mate competition are cheaper for females. Nevertheless, studies increasingly reveal considerable mating costs for males, and these costs should depend on the body size of the individual. We investigated size-dependent predation (ecological) and energetic (physiological) mating costs in male black scavenger flies, Sepsis cynipsea (Diptera: Sepsidae), a model organism for studies of reproductive behavior. We addressed costs of mating by assessing predation risk for differently sized flies in male, female, and mixed-sex groups. Males were not more likely to be predated in mating or mate-search situations. Scathophaga stercoraria (Diptera: Scathophagidae) predators preferred smaller females and males as prey. Male movement in these different social situations does not proximately explain this size-selective predation, as small individuals were not more mobile. We addressed energetic costs of mating by measuring residual longevity (or starvation resistance) of starved males exposed to different mating situations. Copulation, courtship, interaction with reluctant females, or brief interactions with other males, all presumably increasing energy demand, did not significantly reduce longevity of males compared with males not interacting with other individuals. In general, small males died sooner when starved. Overall, we found no direct costs of mating for male S. cynipsea, but both predation and physiological costs were size dependent. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Yvonne Teuschl & Constanze Reim & Wolf U. Blanckenhorn, 2009.
"No size-dependent reproductive costs in male black scavenger flies (Sepsis cynipsea),"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(1), pages 85-90.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2009:i:1:p:85-90
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2009:i:1:p:85-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.