IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2009i1p16-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predator escape tactics in birds: linking ecology and aerodynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Piet J. van den Hout
  • Kimberley J. Mathot
  • Leo R.M. Maas
  • Theunis Piersma

Abstract

In most birds, flight is the most important means of escape from predators. Impaired flight abilities due to increased wing loading may increase vulnerability to predation. To compensate for an increase in wing loading, birds are able to independently decrease body mass (BM) or increase pectoral muscle mass (PMM). Comparing nearshore and farshore foraging shorebird species, we develop a theory as to which of these responses should be the most appropriate. We hypothesize that nearshore foragers should respond to increased predation by increasing their PMM in order to promote speed-based escape. Instead, farshore foragers should decrease BM in order to improve agility for maneuvering escape. Experiments on 2 shorebird species are consistent with these predictions, but on the basis of the theoretical framework for evaluating effect size and biological significance developed here, more experiments are clearly needed. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Piet J. van den Hout & Kimberley J. Mathot & Leo R.M. Maas & Theunis Piersma, 2009. "Predator escape tactics in birds: linking ecology and aerodynamics," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(1), pages 16-25.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2009:i:1:p:16-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp146
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2009:i:1:p:16-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.