IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2009i1p144-152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Female asynchrony may drive disruptive sexual selection on male mating phenotypes in a Heliconius butterfly

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Mendoza-Cuenca
  • Rogelio Macías-Ordóñez

Abstract

Alternative male phenotypes may be a source of novel adaptive traits and may evolve under strong sexual selection. We studied interpopulation differences in male mating behavior related to receptive female synchrony in the monandrous pupal-mating butterfly Heliconius charitonia. In the population in which female-receptive pupae were more synchronous, larger males were unable to monopolize mates; variance in male mating success was lower; strength of sexual selection was weak; and all males competed for access to female pupae using the same strategy (pupal mating). In the population where no more than one female was receptive at a time (extreme asynchrony), only large males competed for pupae, and among these, only the largest individuals successfully mated. Thus, variance in mating success was higher, and sexual selection within pupal maters was stronger. In this population, smaller males patrolled large areas as an alternative mating behavior. When unmated females were experimentally released, small male size was associated with higher mating success. We suggest that alternative patrolling behavior may have evolved under strong sexual selection as a consequence of high asynchrony in receptive female availability in some populations. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Mendoza-Cuenca & Rogelio Macías-Ordóñez, 2009. "Female asynchrony may drive disruptive sexual selection on male mating phenotypes in a Heliconius butterfly," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(1), pages 144-152.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2009:i:1:p:144-152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp163
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2009:i:1:p:144-152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.