IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2009i1p129-137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Foraging efficiency and parasite risk in eastern grey kangaroos (Macropus giganteus)

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah W. Garnick
  • Mark A. Elgar
  • Ian Beveridge
  • Graeme Coulson

Abstract

Large mammalian herbivores must balance foraging efficiency with multiple constraints, including the risk of gastrointestinal parasitism. The costs imposed by gastrointestinal parasites are likely to exert selective pressure on hosts to develop aversion behaviors. Fecal aversion, or the avoidance of foraging patches contaminated by feces, is one mechanism by which herbivores can reduce their exposure to gastrointestinal parasites transmitted through the fecal contamination of foraging grounds. As feces also fertilize the surrounding pasture, herbivores may face a choice between the benefits of increased nutrient intake and an increased risk of parasitism. We investigated fecal aversion in free-ranging eastern grey kangaroos (Macropus giganteus), including the potential conflict between fecal aversion and increased nutrient intake, through a combination of field observations and a field experiment. Kangaroos exhibited fecal aversion by moving through contaminated patches as they were encountered. The experiment revealed that both sward height and fecal contamination affected the kangaroos' choice of foraging patches: kangaroos preferred taller grass but would not accept a higher risk of parasitism for increased nutrient intake. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah W. Garnick & Mark A. Elgar & Ian Beveridge & Graeme Coulson, 2009. "Foraging efficiency and parasite risk in eastern grey kangaroos (Macropus giganteus)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(1), pages 129-137.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2009:i:1:p:129-137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp162
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2009:i:1:p:129-137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.