Author
Listed:
- Sébastien Lebreton
- Claude Chevrier
- Eric Darrouzet
Abstract
Parasitoid females adjust their offspring sex ratio in order to maximize their fitness. The optimal sex ratio they produce varies with several factors but especially with competition level. In solitary species, only one adult can emerge from a given host, whatever the number of eggs laid. In some species, the mortality of supernumerary individuals could be due to larval combats. This ability to fight could vary from one sex to another within species. In this way, when females explore an already parasitized host patch, the sex ratio of previous eggs can influence their fitness. These 2 factors could thus strongly influence females' sex allocation strategies. However, this prediction assumes that parasitoid females can assess the sex of eggs previously laid by conspecifics. We used host acceptance and sex ratio behavior to test this capacity, and our experimental data provide the first evidence for this capacity in a parasitoid species. Females of the solitary ectoparasitoid Anisopteromalus calandrae discriminated the sex of eggs already laid by a conspecific but only when these eggs had reached a certain developmental stage. They adapted their offspring sex ratio as predicted by Hamilton's "sex ratio games" model, allocating the sex of their eggs differentially according to the sex of eggs already on the hosts on which they oviposited. In this way they prevented a lethal larval fight between their sons and the females they could potentially mate after their own emergence, increasing their own fitness and their sons' reproductive success. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Sébastien Lebreton & Claude Chevrier & Eric Darrouzet, 2009.
"Sex allocation strategies in response to conspecifics' offspring sex ratio in solitary parasitoids,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(1), pages 107-112.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2009:i:1:p:107-112
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2009:i:1:p:107-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.