IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i6p1334-1342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why are females ornamented? A test of the courtship stimulation and courtship rejection hypotheses

Author

Listed:
  • Rita Chan
  • Devi Stuart-Fox
  • Tim S. Jessop

Abstract

Female ornamentation was initially thought to reflect genetic correlation with the more elaborate male trait. However, this cannot explain female-specific ornamentation, such as the conspicuous coloration displayed by females of many species during breeding. Females may exhibit distinctive, reproductive coloration to 1) advertise receptivity and stimulate male courtship or 2) advertise nonreceptivity when gravid to reduce male courtship, harassment, and potentially costly copulations. We tested both hypotheses in the Lake Eyre dragon lizard (Ctenophorus maculosus) by quantifying female coloration, using spectroradiometry and a model of lizard color perception, and male and female behavior across the female reproductive cycle. Females develop bright orange coloration on their throat and abdomen during the breeding season, whereas males remain cryptically colored. The onset of orange coloration was associated with enlarging follicles, acceptance of copulations, and escalation of male courtship. Rather than fading once females were no longer receptive, however, the intense orange coloration remained until oviposition. Furthermore, despite maximal coloration associated with nonreceptivity, males persisted with courtship and copulation attempts, and females increased rejection behaviors comprising lateral displays and flipping onto their backs (to prevent forced intromission), both of which emphasize the conspicuous ventrolateral coloration. These apparently costly rejection behaviors did not reduce male harassment but did decrease the frequency of potentially costly copulations. These results suggest that 1) males do not determine female receptivity based on coloration alone and 2) the potentially costly rejection behaviors may have evolved to reduce the direct costs of mating. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Rita Chan & Devi Stuart-Fox & Tim S. Jessop, 2009. "Why are females ornamented? A test of the courtship stimulation and courtship rejection hypotheses," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(6), pages 1334-1342.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:6:p:1334-1342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp136
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David G. Hamilton & Martin J. Whiting & Sarah R. Pryke, 2013. "Fiery frills: carotenoid-based coloration predicts contest success in frillneck lizards," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1138-1149.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:6:p:1334-1342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.