IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i6p1252-1261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Odor preference in house mice: influences of habitat heterogeneity and chromosomal incompatibility

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Claudia Nunes
  • Maria da Luz Mathias
  • Guila Ganem

Abstract

Theory predicts that when maladaptive hybridization occurs assortative mating preference should evolve. Moreover, habitat characteristics can influence quality of mates that is an important criterion in mate choice. Here we ask how chromosomal compatibility and differences in habitat quality might shape preference for odors of the opposite sex in the house mouse. Our study model is composed of 2 chromosomal races and their narrow hybrid zone that occur in habitats of different qualities. We performed 2-way choice tests during which opposite sex urine mixtures of each race were presented to mice from the 2 races and the hybrid zone. Differential investigation of the odor sources indicated both preference and that the odors differed. The results show that the 2 races carry distinct odors and, irrespective of the race they belonged to, males preferred odors of females from the race occurring in habitats of lower quality (hereafter, race B), whereas females preferred odors of males from the race occurring in habitats of better quality (hereafter, race A). Further, preference in the hybrid zone was for race B odors, which differed significantly from that displayed by the 2 races (i.e., for race A odors). The relative influences of geography, ecology, and chromosomal compatibility are discussed, thus leading us to propose that habitat differences might play the most important role in shaping signal divergence and preference in this system. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Claudia Nunes & Maria da Luz Mathias & Guila Ganem, 2009. "Odor preference in house mice: influences of habitat heterogeneity and chromosomal incompatibility," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(6), pages 1252-1261.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:6:p:1252-1261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp122
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:6:p:1252-1261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.