Author
Listed:
- Christina Muck
- Bart Kempenaers
- Sylvia Kuhn
- Mihai Valcu
- Wolfgang Goymann
Abstract
In birds, a high degree of paternal care is expected to correlate with a relatively low frequency of extrapair paternity. If females seek extrapair copulations, they may lose fitness because their partners may reduce paternal care. Conversely, a high degree of paternal care might give females extra opportunities to pursue extrapair copulations, whereas their mates are occupied with offspring care. The aim of this study was to investigate paternity in the classically polyandrous African black coucal. In this sex-role reversed species, males intensively invest in offspring care of altricial young. However, the likelihood of extrapair fertilizations through stored sperm or extrapair copulations seems very high because females lay up to 3 clutches for up to 3 males each. Using 9 novel, highly polymorphic microsatellite loci developed for black coucals, we determined paternity of 127 chicks from 35 nests. Of these, 18 chicks (14.2%) from 13 broods (37.1%) were not fathered by the social male. Black coucals thus have the highest average rate of extrapair paternity reported for any classically polyandrous species. Extrapair young were the result from both extrapair copulations with males outside the female's group of social mates and stored sperm from previous mates. We suggest that males were unable to effectively guard their females to prevent extrapair paternity due to 1) the dense habitat they live in and 2) the onset of incubation before clutch completion. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Christina Muck & Bart Kempenaers & Sylvia Kuhn & Mihai Valcu & Wolfgang Goymann, 2009.
"Paternity in the classical polyandrous black coucal (Centropus grillii)--a cuckoo accepting cuckoldry?,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(6), pages 1185-1193.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:6:p:1185-1193
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:6:p:1185-1193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.