IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i5p1147-1151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Males use sex pheromone assessment to tailor ejaculates to risk of sperm competition in a butterfly

Author

Listed:
  • Helena Larsdotter Mellström
  • Christer Wiklund

Abstract

In polyandrous butterflies males transfer a large, nutritious ejaculate at mating. Larger ejaculates delay female remating and confer an advantage in sperm competition. However, large ejaculates are costly, potentially selecting for male adjustment of ejaculate size to the risk of sperm competition. Here, we test if male ejaculate size in the butterfly Pieris napi varies with male density, and whether males assess sperm competition risk using the male sex pheromone citral as a cue. The results conformed to sperm competition theory and showed that male P. napi tailored their reproductive investment in response to the risk of sperm competition; ejaculates transferred by males in the high male density treatments were on average 23% larger than ejaculates transferred at low male densities. The results also show for the first time that the sex pheromone citral was used by males to assess male density; ejaculates transferred by males in presence of added male sex pheromone were 19% larger than ejaculates transferred in the control. In conclusion, the study shows how the sex pheromone not only facilitates female acceptance when dispensed by courting males but also allows males to assess the degree of male competition for matings. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Helena Larsdotter Mellström & Christer Wiklund, 2009. "Males use sex pheromone assessment to tailor ejaculates to risk of sperm competition in a butterfly," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(5), pages 1147-1151.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:5:p:1147-1151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp109
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:5:p:1147-1151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.