Author
Listed:
- Chiara Benvenuto
- Brenton Knott
- Stephen C. Weeks
Abstract
Precopulatory mate guarding is a complex behavior, influenced by many social and physiological factors, representing a case of intersexual conflict. Mate guarding has often been analyzed with the aid of theoretical models. In these models, it is commonly predicted that mate-guarding time is influenced by encounter rates between males and females, the contenders' relative sizes, and the possible interaction among males (i.e., "takeovers": one guarding male displacing another). The factors influencing male and female guarding decisions have been measured in laboratory experiments but never under natural field conditions. In this field-based study, we observed mate-guarding couples of the clam shrimp Limnadia badia in ephemeral pools on granite rock outcrops in Western Australia. We recorded guarding duration, focusing on the factors considered important in mate-guarding models: male and female size, population density, sex ratio, operational sex ratio, and the status of female receptivity. We also estimated time budgets for males, the possibility of male takeovers, and the potential role of female resistance. We found that female receptivity stage (how close the female was to molting), small male size, and low absolute female presence are key factors in decreasing mate-guarding duration. This study adds a field dimension to manipulative laboratory projects and theoretical models of mate guarding. We were able to observe the simultaneous interactions of multiple factors in the field and to make a robust examination of the ideas of intersexual conflict during mate guarding in these crustaceans. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Chiara Benvenuto & Brenton Knott & Stephen C. Weeks, 2009.
"Mate-guarding behavior in clam shrimp: a field approach,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(5), pages 1125-1132.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:5:p:1125-1132
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:5:p:1125-1132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.