IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i4p891-900.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Condition-dependent alternative mating tactics in a sexually cannibalistic wolf spider

Author

Listed:
  • Dustin J. Wilgers
  • Amy C. Nicholas
  • David H. Reed
  • Gail E. Stratton
  • Eileen A. Hebets

Abstract

Condition-dependent male mating tactics often involve high-quality males capitalizing on the outcome of intersexual selection, whereas low-quality males use behaviors that circumvent female choice to achieve copulation. In the wolf spider Rabidosa punctulata, males display 2 distinct mating tactics: 1) "courtship"--consisting of visual and seismic components or 2) "direct mount"--consisting of males grappling/holding females until they assume a copulatory posture. We tested for condition-dependent tactic expression using both field-collected individuals (representing natural variation in body mass and condition) and individuals whose diet we manipulated in the laboratory (representing extreme divergences in body size and condition). Across both natural and diet manipulated individuals, mating tactic was found to be condition dependent; however, the pattern of tactic expression was initially unexpected. Larger males with better body condition primarily adopted a direct mount tactic, whereas smaller males with poorer body condition primarily utilized courtship. Across all males, copulation success tended to be greatest for the direct mount tactic. We suggest that small, poor condition males predominantly utilize the less-successful mating tactic (courtship) in part due to their increased susceptibility to female cannibalism when attempting a direct mount. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Dustin J. Wilgers & Amy C. Nicholas & David H. Reed & Gail E. Stratton & Eileen A. Hebets, 2009. "Condition-dependent alternative mating tactics in a sexually cannibalistic wolf spider," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(4), pages 891-900.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:4:p:891-900
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp078
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:4:p:891-900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.