IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i3p553-559.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Condition-dependent resource value affects male--male competition in the blue--black grassquit

Author

Listed:
  • Eduardo S.A. Santos
  • Rafael Maia
  • Regina H. Macedo

Abstract

Male--male competition frequently can be resolved without overt aggression through the use of behavioral and phenotypic traits that signal body condition, dominance status, and fighting ability. In this study, we used male blue--black grassquits (Volatinia jacarina) to examine the relationship between male dominance status and behavioral, body condition, and ornamental traits in intrasexual agonistic encounters over a food resource. We found an association between body condition and winning, where winners were lighter than losers. This pattern was explained by low amounts of aggression exhibited by losers when they were heavy. In addition to being lighter, winners were, on average, up to 5 times more aggressive than the heavier losers. There were no associations between ornamental characteristics and dominance status, which suggests that male blue--black grassquits do not exhibit a badge signaling body condition and fighting ability, and we propose that such ornamental characteristics may be more functional in mate-choice contexts. However, the amount of male nuptial plumage of winners predicted the aggressiveness of their opponents, suggesting a social cost for sustaining this ornament. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduardo S.A. Santos & Rafael Maia & Regina H. Macedo, 2009. "Condition-dependent resource value affects male--male competition in the blue--black grassquit," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(3), pages 553-559.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:3:p:553-559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp031
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:3:p:553-559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.