Author
Listed:
- Cas Eikenaar
- David S. Richardson
- Lyanne Brouwer
- Rachel Bristol
- Jan Komdeur
Abstract
In many species, territory ownership is a prerequisite for reproduction; consequently, factors that affect success in territory acquisition can have a large impact on fitness. When competing for territories, some individuals may have an advantage if, for example, they are phenotypically superior or more familiar with the site than others. The relative importance of the many factors involved in territory acquisition is, at present, unclear. We studied patterns of natural territory acquisition in a closed and saturated population of Seychelles warblers. Furthermore, by removing breeders, we experimentally investigated the relative importance, to territory acquisition, of a range of factors and assessed whether this differed between the sexes. In both sexes, the main route to natural territory acquisition was to disperse from the natal territory to immediately claim a vacant dominant position. Males were older than females when acquiring a territory for the first time. In the removal experiment, for both sexes, the proximity of an individual's natal territory to a vacant dominant position was positively related to the individual's chance of claiming the vacancy. Older males were more likely to gain an experimental vacant dominant position than were young males, whereas age did not affect territory acquisition in females. In the Seychelles warbler, the degree of intrasexual competition for territory ownership may be stronger for males than for females because territory ownership is a prerequisite for male reproduction, whereas females can reproduce on their natal territory. In such competition, young males subsequently lose out to older ones. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Cas Eikenaar & David S. Richardson & Lyanne Brouwer & Rachel Bristol & Jan Komdeur, 2009.
"Experimental evaluation of sex differences in territory acquisition in a cooperatively breeding bird,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(1), pages 207-214.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:1:p:207-214
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:1:p:207-214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.