Author
Listed:
- Craig A. Walling
- Clare E. Stamper
- Claire L. Salisbury
- Allen J. Moore
Abstract
Alternative male mating tactics are widespread, but the cues that determine which tactic is adopted remain unclear. Size is commonly associated with alternative mating tactics, but it is not known how individuals gauge their size effectively, especially given that size is relative and frequency dependent. One possibility is that interactions with conspecifics are used to assess size, relative to potential competitors, and thus fine-tune tactics. Success in mating might also influence mating tactics given that this should indicate the potential availability of mates in the population. We tested these ideas in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides, examining whether individuals use the outcome of larval or adult interactions as cues to adjust the tactics used to acquire mates. Male N. vespilloides employ 2 tactics; search for a carcass, a resource required for reproduction, or release a pheromone (call) to attract a mate. Males are plastic in the amount of time they invest in each tactic, and in a related species (Nicrophorus orbicollis), male size influences the tactic adopted. We examine the potential effects of parental care, sibling competition, relative size within a brood, and adult experience of agonistic interactions and mating on tactic adoption. Absolute size was consistently the best predictor of calling rate, with smaller males calling more often than larger males. We suggest that the lack of a response to adult cues may reflect unpredictability in the occurrence of social interactions or stable size distributions in this population. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Craig A. Walling & Clare E. Stamper & Claire L. Salisbury & Allen J. Moore, 2009.
"Experience does not alter alternative mating tactics in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(1), pages 153-159.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:1:p:153-159
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:1:p:153-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.