Author
Listed:
- Barney Luttbeg
- John I. Hammond
- Andrew Sih
Abstract
Predators and prey often engage in a game where predators attempt to be in areas with higher prey densities and prey attempt to be in areas with lower predator densities. A few models have predicted the resulting distributions of predators and prey, but little empirical data exist to test these predictions and to examine how abiotic and biotic factors shape the distributions. Thus, we observed how Anax dragonfly nymphs and Pacific tree frog tadpoles (Pseudacris regilla) either together or separately distributed themselves in an arena with a high- and a low-prey resource patch. Trials were conducted in high- and low-light conditions to manipulate predation risk and to view the effects of this abiotic factor. Counter to the model predictions, we found that predators were not more abundant in high-resource (HR) patches, and they thus did not force prey toward being uniformly distributed. Using a model selection approach to assess what factors affected predator and prey patch-switching movement, we found that prey more often left patches that had more predators present, but predators surprisingly more often left patches with more prey present. Light levels did not affect predation risk; however, in the dark with the associated reduction in visual information predators preferred HR patches. This caused a lower coincidence of prey and predators in patches. Predators also switched patches less often when they occupied the same patch as the other predator. This suggests that predator distributions, and indirectly prey distributions, are affected by the risk of intraguild predation. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.
Suggested Citation
Barney Luttbeg & John I. Hammond & Andrew Sih, 2009.
"Dragonfly larvae and tadpole frog space use games in varied light conditions,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(1), pages 13-21.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:1:p:13-21
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:1:p:13-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.