IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i1p111-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chick-a-dee call variation in Carolina chickadees and recruiting flockmates to food

Author

Listed:
  • Ellen J. Mahurin
  • Todd M. Freeberg

Abstract

The "chick-a-dee" call of many Paridae species (titmice, tits, and chickadees) is structurally complex and functions in social cohesion. Studies with different Parid species suggest that variation in the note composition of calls relates to a wide variety of contexts. An earlier study with Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis), the focal species of the present study, found that receivers responded differently to playback calls differing in note composition in feeding contexts. Here, we addressed whether signalers actually produce calls differing in note composition in feeding contexts and whether those calls might serve a recruitment function. In a first study, we found that the first chickadee to take seed from a feeding station produced calls with a greater number of D notes before the second chickadee arrived to take seed, compared with after the second chickadee arrived to take seed. This suggests that calls with a large number of D notes might serve a general recruitment function. We tested this idea in a second study, using playbacks of calls containing a large number of D notes or a small number of D notes at different sites. We found that the latency for a first chickadee to come into a site and take seed was shorter for playback variants containing a large number of D notes. Thus, in Carolina chickadees, chick-a-dee calls containing a large number of D notes may function to recruit other flock members to a discovered food source. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Ellen J. Mahurin & Todd M. Freeberg, 2009. "Chick-a-dee call variation in Carolina chickadees and recruiting flockmates to food," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(1), pages 111-116.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:1:p:111-116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arn121
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stacia A. Hetrick & Kathryn E. Sieving, 2012. "Antipredator calls of tufted titmice and interspecific transfer of encoded threat information," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 83-92.
    2. Carrie L. Branch & Todd M. Freeberg, 2012. "Distress calls in tufted titmice (Baeolophus bicolor): are conspecifics or predators the target?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 854-862.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:1:p:111-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.